GDForum Supports Net Neutrality

So it's official the government doesn't give two flying fucks about its people

Ladies and gentleman, the proud representative of the FCC. Remember, this man is in charge of your internet.

the senate and house are mostly republican, right?

Oops. Someone "accidentally" leaked Ajij's personal information

That might be one pro

Here's a Canadian's perspective:
If NN is gone, I'm going to lose some good friends
If NN is gone, there might be some months where I never talk to my friends
If NN is gone, a whole country will be angered
If NN is gone, America will have riots about this
If NN is gone, America will not be a better place

your argument is based on flawed logic and misleading information.

i think google donated money to the democrats so you might be right about their politics but i'm not sure ab out mozilla. i'm assuming that you're saying that google and mozilla would change their browsers to make websites they don't like load more slowly for customers. (since that's the only way they could actually affect anything)

first of all, this would be stupid of the companies to do, since all of their conservative customers would create a massive backlash and/or simply switch browsers. there is plenty of competition when it comes to internet browsers. your statement that "NO ONE would be able to view conservative" is ridiculous and is probably based on the stereotype of the extremists who want to shut down free speech.

second, this would have to be installed as an update to the browser. as soon as someone realises that new updates are changing the loading speeds of websites, everyone will know and they could just stop updating their browser. if they have auto update, see my first point.

thirdly, if they are already allowed to do this, and would actually be prepared to do it, why wouldn't google and mozilla be changing loading times RIGHT NOW? exactly, they know it's stupid so they aren't doing it.

fourth, if net neutrality is repealed, ISPS WOULD BE ABLE TO DO THE SAME THING! that's right, they could slow down, or block content promoting democrats because they would make the isps pay more tax or whatever (not saying that's true, it's just a hypothetical example). and guess what? they already do in some countries (look it up). this is DIFFERENT from internet browsers, because browsers have huge competition with hundreds if not thousands of browsers out there. some people have access to just two or even one isp.

it seems hypocritical that you only care about free speech getting hindered when it's YOUR political view that's affected, and you're fine if it's the opposition (either that or you didn't think it through).