|
Post by Deleted on Sept 18, 2016 17:36:09 GMT -5
i mean another chance, and make a giant announcements of it being revoked when abused, because the staff have improved since the ranks existed. With more rule enforcement, the ranks might not promote spam, as long as there are strict mods doing their job It's been proven in the past that more rule enforcement usually doesn't help stop the promotion of spam/useless posting/etc. In fact, in many cases it actually makes it worse. I personally wouldn't mind seeing posting ranks added, I mean they do add some variety to the forum, and makes it more fun to post, but I know for a fact that many members will abuse it as soon as it's added. And if they were to be re-added, I don't think that it's a good idea to have 20+ different ranks, which is how many there would be if all the GD and GDM levels were included in them; this would probably promote spam even more; I think that 3-5 ranks is all that's necessary. I second this. I'd much prefer there to be these kind of ranks: 10 posts 100 posts 250 posts 500 posts 1000 posts RyanAB If you do consider bringing back ranks, please make sure they aren't too high! Thank you
|
|
WillFlame
Owner
Direful Reflection
An idea has taken root.
5,190 posts
Discord: WillFlame#5739
Favorite Level: Colourful Overnight
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"https://i.imgur.com/4y98NDS.png","color":""}
Mini-Profile Name Color: 00a3ff
Mini-Profile Text Color: ffffff
|
Post by WillFlame on Sept 18, 2016 18:26:42 GMT -5
Well this thread grew quickly.
I always liked the posting ranks, and I obviously want to bring them back. I don't see what's wrong with warning people if they spam; there is absolutely no reason to spam in regular boards (now that the NSL is staying) and if they do, they definitely deserve a warning and would have deserved one whether the ranks were brought back or not. If the ranks cause a change of behaviour in posters, we don't want those kinds of members in our forums anyways, so you can think of them like a filter to see who can handle them and who can't.
The ranks make the forum special, give a more GD feel, and encourage less active and new members to start posting and be active.
And so, the length of these ranks shouldn't matter either. It can go up to 100,000, and like I stated earlier, if it encourages certain members to spam then they should have been warned for their behaviour previously anyways.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2016 14:28:15 GMT -5
Well this thread grew quickly. I always liked the posting ranks, and I obviously want to bring them back. I don't see what's wrong with warning people if they spam; there is absolutely no reason to spam in regular boards (now that the NSL is staying) and if they do, they definitely deserve a warning and would have deserved one whether the ranks were brought back or not. If the ranks cause a change of behaviour in posters, we don't want those kinds of members in our forums anyways, so you can think of them like a filter to see who can handle them and who can't. The ranks make the forum special, give a more GD feel, and encourage less active and new members to start posting and be active. And so, the length of these ranks shouldn't matter either. It can go up to 100,000, and like I stated earlier, if it encourages certain members to spam then they should have been warned for their behaviour previously anyways. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ T H I S
|
|
1,066 posts
Creator Points: 0
Favorite Level: X by TriAxis and Tama_N
Hardest Demon: ffffff
Mini-Profile Background: ffffff
|
Post by [ScutBug]CreepE on Sept 19, 2016 19:05:52 GMT -5
maybe instead of levels it could go by difficulty faces? because there are too many levels now, with more coming (inb4 2.1 never release jokes)
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 26, 2016 6:11:14 GMT -5
maybe instead of levels it could go by difficulty faces? because there are too many levels now, with more coming (inb4 2.1 never release jokes) I doubt anyone wants to be called insane
|
|
1,066 posts
Creator Points: 0
Favorite Level: X by TriAxis and Tama_N
Hardest Demon: ffffff
Mini-Profile Background: ffffff
|
Post by [ScutBug]CreepE on Sept 26, 2016 8:45:09 GMT -5
maybe instead of levels it could go by difficulty faces? because there are too many levels now, with more coming (inb4 2.1 never release jokes) I doubt anyone wants to be called insane id be fine with it ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) but seriously, if member ranks are added back, levels would be too much, we need something else. and no, the acievements were stupid
|
|
1,083 posts
Discord: Cloudstar#2872
Mini-Profile Background: https://i.gifer.com/QFNv.gif
Mini-Profile Name Color: 32cd32
Mini-Profile Text Color: Ffcc00
|
Post by Cloudstar on Sept 27, 2016 14:25:46 GMT -5
maybe instead of levels it could go by difficulty faces? because there are too many levels now, with more coming (inb4 2.1 never release jokes) I doubt anyone wants to be called insane I like the idea of having difficulties though; if we ever bring back ranks then that seems like the best option, that way everyone would have the ranks GD related like they want, but at the same time it's not too long. I was also thinking that maybe the difficulty faces could appear next to the rank name, much like swords appear next to staff names. So it would look like this: Easy: 0-100 posts Normal: 101-250 posts Hard: 250-500 posts Harder: 500-1,000 posts Insane: 1,000-5,000 posts Demon: 5,000+ posts Or instead of stars you could just have the difficulty face under the rank. To be honest, I'd rather leave the ranks where they are for reasons I've already stated, but this is just a thought. In my opinion, this is better than having 20 different ranks for every single main level.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 27, 2016 14:26:56 GMT -5
I doubt anyone wants to be called insane I like the idea of having difficulties though; if we ever bring back ranks then that seems like the best option, that way everyone would have the ranks GD related like they want, but at the same time it's not too long. I was also thinking that maybe the difficulty faces could appear next to the rank name, much like swords appear next to staff names. So it would look like this: Easy: 0-100 posts Normal: 101-250 posts Hard: 250-500 posts Harder: 500-1,000 posts Insane: 1,000-5,000 posts Demon: 5,000+ posts Or instead of stars you could just have the difficulty face under the rank. To be honest, I'd rather leave the ranks where they are for reasons I've already stated, but this is just a thought. In my opinion, this is better than having 20 different ranks for every single main level. damn, this could actually work! You should discuss this with staff and see what they think, nice
|
|
1,066 posts
Creator Points: 0
Favorite Level: X by TriAxis and Tama_N
Hardest Demon: ffffff
Mini-Profile Background: ffffff
|
Post by [ScutBug]CreepE on Sept 27, 2016 17:51:28 GMT -5
I doubt anyone wants to be called insane I like the idea of having difficulties though; if we ever bring back ranks then that seems like the best option, that way everyone would have the ranks GD related like they want, but at the same time it's not too long. I was also thinking that maybe the difficulty faces could appear next to the rank name, much like swords appear next to staff names. So it would look like this: Easy: 0-100 posts Normal: 101-250 posts Hard: 250-500 posts Harder: 500-1,000 posts Insane: 1,000-5,000 posts Demon: 5,000+ posts Or instead of stars you could just have the difficulty face under the rank. To be honest, I'd rather leave the ranks where they are for reasons I've already stated, but this is just a thought. In my opinion, this is better than having 20 different ranks for every single main level. you could also add in N/A and Auto, with N/A as 0-10 posts, Auto as 11-50 posts
|
|
|
Post by Hola on Sept 30, 2016 11:36:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Agg on Sept 30, 2016 11:44:12 GMT -5
|
|
3,110 posts
Favorite Level: Toxic sewers
Hardest Demon: ultra drivers
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"ac1aab"}
Mini-Profile Name Color: fa55f3
Mini-Profile Text Color: f842f0
|
Post by Retired moderator. on Oct 1, 2016 0:00:55 GMT -5
It's not coming back. We talked about it, basically we all agreed that this would be a bad idea.
|
|
2,520 posts
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000000"}
Mini-Profile Name Color: ffffff
Mini-Profile Text Color: ffffff
|
Post by RyanAB on Oct 1, 2016 8:58:52 GMT -5
Ian said it here first, we didn't think it would end well at this state of the forum.
|
|
|
Post by Waterarko on Oct 1, 2016 9:04:10 GMT -5
Ian said it here first, we didn't think it would end well at this state of the forum. I don't get it, why or how can anything bad happen with that when we have rules?
|
|
2,520 posts
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000000"}
Mini-Profile Name Color: ffffff
Mini-Profile Text Color: ffffff
|
Post by RyanAB on Oct 1, 2016 9:04:59 GMT -5
Ian said it here first, we didn't think it would end well at this state of the forum. I don't get it, why or how can anything bad happen with that when we have rules? because rules are broken all the time?
|
|