WinterKeru
Stereo Madness
18, male, college student, bored af
6 posts
Creator Points: 1
Favorite Level: Saeclum by Herzilo
Hardest Demon: PG Clubstep by PG1004
Mini-Profile Background: 00f5ff
|
Post by WinterKeru on Oct 19, 2015 6:05:08 GMT -5
ID: 10014374 Difficulty: Harder no stars Stars Suggestion: Maybe 8 stars (According to the last time I requested the stars when I'm about to update the level) This is my 6th level, and my best work (for now)!  Some trivias about the level: - I start creating this level in GD 1.93 - After GD 2.0 gives option to change the level's background to completely plain (no patterns and stuff), the level had a massive objects drop from around 17.000 objects used to around 11.500+ objects used - This is my first level that use some 2.0 stuffs - I think... Memorizing some parts of the level is important to pass this level - This level is inspired after my No. 1 favorite pokemon of all time, Roserade - The name, "Petal Dance" is the name of one of the moves that Roserade can learn in-game Here's the video of da level! -----> www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnRPnlLRyrIThank you! Remember to leave a like and comment about the level (Sorry if there are some grammar mistakes, I'm not a native english speaker) |
|
396 posts
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"1d81bf"}
Mini-Profile Name Color: 1c2833
Mini-Profile Text Color: aed6f1
|
Post by Cheeseman on Oct 20, 2015 17:17:58 GMT -5
I think similarly to above, but not the same.
10/10 for creativity is a definite yes.
I don't like the design though. I find it rather ugly and I have no idea why you decided to use orbs as decoration. It's just confusing. It's a huge, major problem with the level in my eyes.
Gameplay is fine though, except for the confusion caused by the orbs
4/10
|
|
|
|
Post by Jumpyhead on Oct 20, 2015 18:51:02 GMT -5
I think similarly to above, but not the same. 10/10 for creativity is a definite yes. I don't like the design though. I find it rather ugly and I have no idea why you decided to use orbs as decoration. It's just confusing. It's a huge, major problem with the level in my eyes. Gameplay is fine though, except for the confusion caused by the orbs 4/10 One again, Cheeseman, you can't take off 6 points on the sole basis of him using orbs for decoration. Your reviews are starting to get biased. |
|
|
|
Post by Jumpyhead on Oct 20, 2015 20:03:50 GMT -5
On ce again, Cheeseman, you can't take off 6 points on the sole basis of him using orbs for decoration. Your reviews are starting to get biased. I thought it wouldn't be necessary for a long review as one had already been made, turns out I do. I don't like the design, full stop/period. I know what this was trying to achieve, but many other levels have managed to execute similar things far better. The colours don't go well together, it all seems too vibrant and in your face. Decoration is in the form of orbs. This is not a 6 point deduction, but the simple fact that it is almost the only decoration throughout the entire level is just bizarre and wrong. No level uses orbs for decoration, they always have some sort of purpose, be it for being used, or there to make you muck up, not for making the level "prettier". It lacks and uses the wrong stuff. This not only affects the design and decoration, but it also messes with the gameplay massively. These points combined make this level unenjoyable and that is the point of a level. So no, not a biased review. So now you are saying the colors and the orbs combined are a 6 point reduction... Learn how to weight elements properly. I like to use this: Gameplay: x/3Creativity: x/4Music Sync: x/3This should keep your reviews from getting too one-ended |
|
|
|
Post by Jumpyhead on Oct 20, 2015 20:26:55 GMT -5
Let's get onto a little thing called "opinion". I have one. You have one. My opinion is one thing. Your opinion is another thing. I respect your opinion, even if it isn't what I believe. I am not saying that the reason why you have docked "x" points for this or that is too generous or wrong and that you should change it. That's the way you do your personal review. There is logic to your system, so there is no need to alter things. It may not be the same logic as I use, and that is why things come out differently. You should do the same. If you don't my system, then that's that. It's all subjective. Besides the point, your 7 might mean something completely different to my 7. A 7 is a 7, not something to classify levels with. I am thinking of revamping my system so that it uses a star system, 1 being needs improvement (currently equivalent to anything between 0 and 4.99), 2 being decent (currently equivalent to anything between 5 and 6.49), 3 being good (currently equivalent to 6.5 to 8.49) and 4 being feature worthy (8.5 to 10, 9.5-10 being personal picks) I would like this level improved, so I am saying 4/10, needs improvement. You might like it, but you haven't had your say yet. I respect that, and you should do the same with mine. Like I said, I have my system, just like you do. See that's your problem. We can't work with a "subjective" system, its the dumbest idea ever! Lets say, If you thought a level was great you gave it a 7, because to you that "means" great. I see the same level and think its great, but I use an objective judging rubric, which gives it a 9. If we don't all use the same rubric, then things like "I wish (insert judge name here) would review my levels, he seems so lenient!" or vice versa will start emerging. Cmon Cheeseman think this through! Grideos understands how this works right? |
|
|
|
Post by Jumpyhead on Oct 20, 2015 20:42:01 GMT -5
Firstly, I could care less if you wrote some reviews on cars. Secondly, I notice you write so much in those reviews, yet your reviews here are almost always just 2 sentences. And yes, such a system should be necessary. Anyways, your argment is completely invalidated, as I could claim the same thing and give every level I judged a 10/10 |
|
|
|
Post by megaman9 on Oct 21, 2015 8:42:04 GMT -5
Jumpyhead please stop acting like you own this entire system. Cheeseman's reviews are fine and unbiased. He's stating his opinions just like the other judges are stating theirs, and you're stating yours. You're really the ONLY person that has a problem with these reviews.
|
|
|
|
Post by Grideos on Oct 21, 2015 13:19:02 GMT -5
I'm agreeing with both Jumpy and Cheeseman. I totally agree that we need a new system, and that we should give more decent scores.. If I got a 4/10 I wouldn't feel that good, even though it says very good level. (Not saying you did this Cheese) but also maybe instead do a little like I do? (Not trying to brag about me, but it's easier for them to understand) what I did was to first put score. For example this level I would give a 6.5/10 and after that I'd say Good level, (blablabla) then tag Jumpyhead approve and QJrocks Move to Good section please.. I'd say what section, and what rating it would get, instead of just giving out a score... They might just be a little confused, and the levels can be moved faster if you actually tag someone who can.. Like megaman9And also.. Those car reviews can't be compared to GD. If you compare some car reviews to a geometry dash level review, well it just isn't fitting. And, people experiment with different decorations Cheeseman if someone tries to decorate with orbs, it can be good. (I've soon some featured levels with orbs as deco. The only problem is the more orbs that lead into "nothing" can be a secret way, but that doesn't seem like it for those levels. It was easy and fun to play (this level) Also, you shouldn't take away so much of the gameplay and others just because you don't like it.. Ofc this level can have many bugs, but maybe it makes the gameplay more fun if you actually manage to clear the level with a sick alternate route It just means that there is much variations results  And also for those who is reading this of mods, first of all... We should really delete this conversation on a guy's level  Please don't hate me for this, I'm just trying to share my point of view. |
|
|
|
Post by megaman9 on Oct 21, 2015 14:24:00 GMT -5
I'm agreeing with both Jumpy and Cheeseman. I totally agree that we need a new system, and that we should give more decent scores.. If I got a 4/10 I wouldn't feel that good, even though it says very good level. (Not saying you did this Cheese) but also maybe instead do a little like I do? (Not trying to brag about me, but it's easier for them to understand) what I did was to first put score. For example this level I would give a 6.5/10 and after that I'd say Good level, (blablabla) then tag Jumpyhead approve and QJrocks Move to Good section please.. I'd say what section, and what rating it would get, instead of just giving out a score... They might just be a little confused, and the levels can be moved faster if you actually tag someone who can.. Like megaman9And also.. Those car reviews can't be compared to GD. If you compare some car reviews to a geometry dash level review, well it just isn't fitting. And, people experiment with different decorations Cheeseman if someone tries to decorate with orbs, it can be good. (I've soon some featured levels with orbs as deco. The only problem is the more orbs that lead into "nothing" can be a secret way, but that doesn't seem like it for those levels. It was easy and fun to play (this level) Also, you shouldn't take away so much of the gameplay and others just because you don't like it.. Ofc this level can have many bugs, but maybe it makes the gameplay more fun if you actually manage to clear the level with a sick alternate route It just means that there is much variations results And also for those who is reading this of mods, first of all... We should really delete this conversation on a guy's level Please don't hate me for this, I'm just trying to share my point of view. Good argument. A 4/10 shouldn't really make you feel BAD, it should tell you that you need to improve your level. And the review SHOULD say how you can do so. But see, Jumpyhead is calling bias on Cheeseman for expressing his personal opinions, which isn't right. Opinions and bias are two totally different things. Bias is more like "i dun liek u mso u get an 3/10 xddddddd" |
|
|
|
Post by Grideos on Oct 21, 2015 14:25:03 GMT -5
I'm agreeing with both Jumpy and Cheeseman. I totally agree that we need a new system, and that we should give more decent scores.. If I got a 4/10 I wouldn't feel that good, even though it says very good level. (Not saying you did this Cheese) but also maybe instead do a little like I do? (Not trying to brag about me, but it's easier for them to understand) what I did was to first put score. For example this level I would give a 6.5/10 and after that I'd say Good level, (blablabla) then tag Jumpyhead approve and QJrocks Move to Good section please.. I'd say what section, and what rating it would get, instead of just giving out a score... They might just be a little confused, and the levels can be moved faster if you actually tag someone who can.. Like megaman9And also.. Those car reviews can't be compared to GD. If you compare some car reviews to a geometry dash level review, well it just isn't fitting. And, people experiment with different decorations Cheeseman if someone tries to decorate with orbs, it can be good. (I've soon some featured levels with orbs as deco. The only problem is the more orbs that lead into "nothing" can be a secret way, but that doesn't seem like it for those levels. It was easy and fun to play (this level) Also, you shouldn't take away so much of the gameplay and others just because you don't like it.. Ofc this level can have many bugs, but maybe it makes the gameplay more fun if you actually manage to clear the level with a sick alternate route It just means that there is much variations results And also for those who is reading this of mods, first of all... We should really delete this conversation on a guy's level Please don't hate me for this, I'm just trying to share my point of view. Good argument. A 4/10 shouldn't really make you feel BAD, it should tell you that you need to improve your level. And the review SHOULD say how you can do so. But see, Jumpyhead is calling bias on Cheeseman for expressing his personal opinions, which isn't right. Opinions and bias are two totally different things. Bias is more like "i dun liek u mso u get an 3/10 xddddddd" Lel.. Totally agree, oh and could you pl0x move this to good section... I think it deserves it for at least trying to create something cool and fun to experiment with. |
|
|
|
Post by Jumpyhead on Oct 21, 2015 17:19:08 GMT -5
I'm agreeing with both Jumpy and Cheeseman. I totally agree that we need a new system, and that we should give more decent scores.. If I got a 4/10 I wouldn't feel that good, even though it says very good level. (Not saying you did this Cheese) but also maybe instead do a little like I do? (Not trying to brag about me, but it's easier for them to understand) what I did was to first put score. For example this level I would give a 6.5/10 and after that I'd say Good level, (blablabla) then tag Jumpyhead approve and QJrocks Move to Good section please.. I'd say what section, and what rating it would get, instead of just giving out a score... They might just be a little confused, and the levels can be moved faster if you actually tag someone who can.. Like megaman9And also.. Those car reviews can't be compared to GD. If you compare some car reviews to a geometry dash level review, well it just isn't fitting. And, people experiment with different decorations Cheeseman if someone tries to decorate with orbs, it can be good. (I've soon some featured levels with orbs as deco. The only problem is the more orbs that lead into "nothing" can be a secret way, but that doesn't seem like it for those levels. It was easy and fun to play (this level) Also, you shouldn't take away so much of the gameplay and others just because you don't like it.. Ofc this level can have many bugs, but maybe it makes the gameplay more fun if you actually manage to clear the level with a sick alternate route It just means that there is much variations results And also for those who is reading this of mods, first of all... We should really delete this conversation on a guy's level Please don't hate me for this, I'm just trying to share my point of view. Good argument. A 4/10 shouldn't really make you feel BAD, it should tell you that you need to improve your level. And the review SHOULD say how you can do so. But see, Jumpyhead is calling bias on Cheeseman for expressing his personal opinions, which isn't right. Opinions and bias are two totally different things. Bias is more like "i dun liek u mso u get an 3/10 xddddddd" Megaaaaa Cheeseman deleted his posts, some of them were biased af |
|
|
|
Post by CamRa on Oct 22, 2015 8:18:34 GMT -5
Move this, it got rated
|
|
|
|
Post by Jumpyhead on Oct 22, 2015 18:13:35 GMT -5
This got rated? Interesting. |
|
|
|
Post by Grideos on Oct 22, 2015 23:42:28 GMT -5
This got rated? Interesting. I told ya guys it was a good level |
|
|
|
Post by Jumpyhead on Oct 24, 2015 14:05:43 GMT -5
This got rated? Interesting. I told ya guys it was a good level Why is it in decent .. |
|
