|
Post by XilaskaR on Oct 19, 2017 16:53:54 GMT -5
These ideas are used by many other forums that require people to give feedback to other people on something. Here’s an easy way to increase level reviews way more: Number 1: Courtesy SystemJust change “animation” to “level” and you got a way to encourage people doing more reviews. People can already do this, but encouraging it more could help a lot. Number 2: Judging queues
This is taken mostly by the “osu!” forums. Basically, a level judge can have his own “judging queue” thread, that will explain rules a level has to follow for it to be on his queue, and when the judge wants, he can open the queue for 3 things, or it could be just 2, however you want. 1-NR = A normal review, just asking for the thread of a level, and within some days, the judge shall review the level. 2-R4R = Review 4 Review, pretty self-explanatory, a judge reviews a level, but then the member shall review one of the judge’s levels as well. 3-Collab = This one is the one I doubt more tbh. Would a collab queue work? Showing how a member builds in a thread, and when the queue is open, another member can post how he builds and the OP could decide who to collab with. Idk, just random ideas that pop to my mind.
|
|
|
Post by Dragon on Oct 19, 2017 17:25:10 GMT -5
The R4R thing doesn’t really work.
Example: I like to judge levels, but I don’t create very often. Therefore I wouldn’t be able to judge levels with this.
Also the collab thing is confusing.
I could see this working otherwise though.
|
|
|
Post by DubstepJoltik on Oct 19, 2017 17:28:45 GMT -5
I actually really like the queue thread, I now I kinda want one of my own. But I don't like the R4R one. I don't like exchanging reviews or likes or subscribers or anything, because it just seems kind of weak, but the other two threads seem really cool. But I don't really like the "asking for courtesy" idea. It just seems really desperate, if not manipulative. But I do like the queue thread idea, and now
|
|
1,529 posts
Discord: CreativeGuy#3418
Creator Points: 0
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"1c23be"}
Mini-Profile Name Color: 06001b
Mini-Profile Text Color: 06001b
|
Post by CreativeGuy on Oct 19, 2017 20:12:17 GMT -5
I personally don't think these ideas would help all that well, and the R4R would just attract lazy, desperate reviews with no real criticism. I usually just judge levels I'm tagged in or threads which the creator messaged me about first, if I finish those I just pick a level I think I have time to judge, so I don't really think I need a special queue thread for it.
I think the main issue is the fact that most judges are inactive nowadays, so we need fresh, new judges to get more levels reviewed.
Edit: Although the queue system is entirely up to the judge.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 20, 2017 7:15:21 GMT -5
I think the main issue is the fact that most judges are inactive nowadays, so we need fresh, new judges to get more levels reviewed. this this this and this^^^^^^^^^ seriously, get people who can do those jobs. support mods are practically gone, with it being replaced with moderators and other people who i personally think should be support mods. news casters are about the only balance, since they all contribute towards making the news.
|
|
|
Post by XilaskaR on Oct 20, 2017 8:44:13 GMT -5
Tbh the R4R thing is true, and the courtesy thing probably as well.
I do think the queue would help both judges to find levels to judge and creators to get reviews, though. Plus, it would encourage more activity.
|
|