STARxd
Stereo Madness
I beat The Hell Factory
5 posts
Creator Points: 2
|
Post by STARxd on Dec 7, 2016 22:37:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Polarbeahr on Dec 9, 2016 3:33:31 GMT -5
Oh god, that's a pretty neat level!  |
|
|
|
Post by artsy on Dec 18, 2016 15:30:43 GMT -5
Moved to Sent Levels  |
|
|
|
Post by DubstepJoltik on Jun 18, 2017 8:42:56 GMT -5
Before I review this level, I just want to say, hi, Starxd. I remember binge watching your Exposing series, and I can understand why you don't want to do it anymore. I respect this decision, and I'm happy for you. Now for the level. Considering this was a 2.0 level, I'm not really supposed to expect as much as I would if this level was made in 2.1. I can't really blame you for that, though, because this level was promised a feature eight months ago, before 2.1 was released. The backgrounds of this level are very nice to look at, but sadly, I think they're mostly pretty basic. The backgrounds consist of objects that already exist in GD instead of making something new, like Jayuff's background style, for example. They're still visually nice to look at, with colors and opacity added in. The gameplay overall is actually not good, especially at the wave part at the beginning. It seems to be random for pretty much the entire level. Everything just seems to move at random--just, everything is random. There isn't another way to describe it, sadly. When I look at the gameplay, I just see obstacles moving around trying to kill you. The song choice could be better. This song was used quite a few times in 2.0 and I feel there could've been better fits regarding the song. However, the song does go well with the level's feel, or emotion (I guess). (Side note: The wave part at the beginning seems to be copy-pasted triggers, because the moving blocks move at the exact same height and speed throughout that one part of the level. This doesn't really matter too much to me, though.) (Just a quick note, I have my own rating system.) On a scale of 0-100%, with ≥64% being feature-worthy and ≥82% being epic-worthy, I'd give your level a 66%. While the level is definitely not worthy of a place in the Hall Of Fame, and it might be too late for a feature, I still think your level might have a fighting chance. The decoration is easily the saving grace of the level. I hope you enjoyed my feedback. I don't review levels often so...yeah.  |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2017 3:34:49 GMT -5
Assuming I'm getting your criteria right this should belong in Good, but this is already in Sent Levels. Although you've reviewed levels that are already reviewed by other people and judges I'll be approving them all and moving them to their respective categories. Try not to judge levels in the Sent Levels section and the Needs Improvement - Feature Worthy boards as they don't need to be judged. Oh, and putting an explanation of your criteria in your signature would be good as you don't have to waste time writing it out at the end of every review. |
|
|
|
Post by DubstepJoltik on Jun 19, 2017 6:43:28 GMT -5
Assuming I'm getting your criteria right this should belong in Good, but this is already in Sent Levels. Although you've reviewed levels that are already reviewed by other people and judges I'll be approving them all and moving them to their respective categories. Try not to judge levels in the Sent Levels section and the Needs Improvement - Feature Worthy boards as they don't need to be judged. Oh, and putting an explanation of your criteria in your signature would be good as you don't have to waste time writing it out at the end of every review. Thank you for the feedback. I usually review levels in the Outdated Levels area, but I may as well try a different category. |
|
