|
Post by Hola on Sept 17, 2016 5:56:07 GMT -5
you know when players below 2000 stars we're on the leaderboards
in my opinion yes
|
|
2,446 posts
Discord: VegetarianBacon#5162
Creator Points: 2
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000000"}
Mini-Profile Name Color: ffc700
Mini-Profile Text Color: ffffff
|
Post by VegetarianBacon on Sept 17, 2016 6:00:26 GMT -5
I would vote yes, but RobTop can't because it is server related
|
|
|
Post by Hola on Sept 17, 2016 6:10:38 GMT -5
I would vote yes, but RobTop can't because it is server related he could do it to like 1000 stars maybe if its server related
|
|
|
Post by Ezel on Sept 17, 2016 6:14:53 GMT -5
To be honest, I don't care very much anymore, as I have over 3,5k stars, so welp.
But I remember he said that it was done to reduce leaderboard lag.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2016 6:20:33 GMT -5
No
Where it is, as it is (Except for some stuff)
|
|
|
Post by Supersebi3 on Sept 17, 2016 7:20:13 GMT -5
No
Where it is, as it is (Except for all those hackers) ftfy
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2016 7:30:42 GMT -5
the limit should be 1000 or 500, not 2000 .-.
tl;dr yes
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2016 7:41:37 GMT -5
the limit should be 1000 or 500, not 2000 .-. tl;dr yes Thank you for the tl;dr, I didn't have the time to read through that MASSIVE wall of text OT: I don't see why the leaderboard requirement needed to get raised this high. I liked it better when it was at 300 stars. It could be cool to see the stats of old players
|
|
|
Post by SeptaGon7 on Sept 18, 2016 9:57:14 GMT -5
There are millions of players and most have below 2000 stars, so if there was no leaderboard limit or it was smaller, it would be much laggier and harder to work with
|
|