972 posts
Clans: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Hardest Demon: ffffff
Mini-Profile Background: ffffff
Mini-Profile Name Color: {"image":"http://3danimation.e-spaces.com/backgrounds/hd_background_american_flag.jpg","color":""}
|
Post by DyucFkemAdd on Mar 22, 2016 16:20:27 GMT -5
So, what's the point of this? Do you think the staff are doing all of these things wrong? no, these are tips not "what i think that staff is doing wrong" |
|
3,110 posts
Favorite Level: Toxic sewers
Hardest Demon: ultra drivers
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"ac1aab"}
Mini-Profile Name Color: fa55f3
Mini-Profile Text Color: f842f0
|
Post by Retired moderator. on Mar 22, 2016 16:22:39 GMT -5
Can I get some keywords to make searching easier? couldnt find when he was on but I did see when megaman first told us this. I swear, he better have good reasons to kick someone out. I think that he should put us through multiple tests to see if we are worthy. I think that's a lot more fair. quote from lumpy : and he says the reason he wants to get rid of most of the current judges is because they don’t have enough creating experience to have accurate judgement and that their reviews aren’t good enough (not sure exactly how, but I think he wants more detailed and precise judgers who will be honest yet supportive) quote from megaman: So [IG][GP] MegaMan Michigun jokingly said that he operates in the shadows From: [IG][GP] MegaMan Then he said that we can demote him if we want From: [IG][GP] MegaMan Then Razor said this From: [IG][GP] MegaMan RazzySharp - Today 7:53 AM > Michi can remain in the shadows, I don't really mind RazzySharp - Today 7:54 AM > ppl just complain about inactive staff and im just saying "they're not hurting anyone quote from r4z0r: [IG][GP] MegaMan - Today 2:24 PM > Who do you think should be a judge maybe most of top 100 creators Some highlights from the skype chat. Do movie critics need to produce blockbusters in order to critique movies? No? Then why the fuck does having creator points matter. That system is purely luck in the first place. I mean, have you seen the feature worthy board? |
|
|
|
Post by R4Z0R on Mar 22, 2016 18:34:06 GMT -5
quote from lumpy : and he says the reason he wants to get rid of most of the current judges is because they don’t have enough creating experience to have accurate judgement and that their reviews aren’t good enough (not sure exactly how, but I think he wants more detailed and precise judgers who will be honest yet supportive) quote from megaman: So [IG][GP] MegaMan Michigun jokingly said that he operates in the shadows From: [IG][GP] MegaMan Then he said that we can demote him if we want From: [IG][GP] MegaMan Then Razor said this From: [IG][GP] MegaMan RazzySharp - Today 7:53 AM > Michi can remain in the shadows, I don't really mind RazzySharp - Today 7:54 AM > ppl just complain about inactive staff and im just saying "they're not hurting anyone quote from r4z0r: [IG][GP] MegaMan - Today 2:24 PM > Who do you think should be a judge maybe most of top 100 creators Some highlights from the skype chat. Do movie critics need to produce blockbusters in order to critique movies? No? Then why the **** does having creator points matter. That system is purely luck in the first place. I mean, have you seen the feature worthy board? No, you're right. But I think there might be a slight difference between the guy who made Nine Circles XIII and someone like Mazl when it comes to reviewing levels. There's a reason we appreciate certain critics, even if they don't make movies, and that's because they make well thought-out reviews, and point out how you can make something better. Most top 100 know what a feature worthy level is, and they know how to make good design and gameplay. I never liked the idea of level judges from the start anyways. And even if the staff agree to demote all current level judges, that doesn't mean you can't still write reviews for levels on the thread. It only means you wouldn't be able to move them into a board until a level judge sees. |
|
2,322 posts
Hardest Demon: Blue
Mini-Profile Name Color: {"image":"http://freedesignfile.com/upload/2014/07/Shiny-eco-style-green-background-vector-01.jpg","color":""}
|
Post by ~Pear~ on Mar 22, 2016 18:39:19 GMT -5
Do movie critics need to produce blockbusters in order to critique movies? No? Then why the **** does having creator points matter. That system is purely luck in the first place. I mean, have you seen the feature worthy board? No, you're right. But I think there might be a slight difference between the guy who made Nine Circles XIII and someone like Mazl when it comes to reviewing levels. There's a reason we appreciate certain critics, even if they don't make movies, and that's because they make well thought-out reviews, and point out how you can make something better. Most top 100 know what a feature worthy level is, and they know how to make good design and gameplay. I never liked the idea of level judges from the start anyways. And even if the staff agree to demote all current level judges, that doesn't mean you can't still write reviews for levels on the thread. It only means you wouldn't be able to move them into a board until a level judge sees. The level judge system is doing great so far. What exactly would the point be in demoting all active judges and put inactive people as the judges so that nothing gets moved. There are barely any active "top 100 creators" in this forum anyways. |
|
3,110 posts
Favorite Level: Toxic sewers
Hardest Demon: ultra drivers
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"ac1aab"}
Mini-Profile Name Color: fa55f3
Mini-Profile Text Color: f842f0
|
Post by Retired moderator. on Mar 22, 2016 18:39:31 GMT -5
Do movie critics need to produce blockbusters in order to critique movies? No? Then why the **** does having creator points matter. That system is purely luck in the first place. I mean, have you seen the feature worthy board? No, you're right. But I think there might be a slight difference between the guy who made Nine Circles XIII and someone like Mazl when it comes to reviewing levels. There's a reason we appreciate certain critics, even if they don't make movies, and that's because they make well thought-out reviews, and point out how you can make something better. Most top 100 know what a feature worthy level is, and they know how to make good design and gameplay. I never liked the idea of level judges from the start anyways. And even if the staff agree to demote all current level judges, that doesn't mean you can't still write reviews for levels on the thread. It only means you wouldn't be able to move them into a board until a level judge sees. I suggest you make a series of tests to see if we are worthy of being a level judge. That's a lot more fair than mass demoting everyone. |
|
2,520 posts
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000000"}
Mini-Profile Name Color: ffffff
Mini-Profile Text Color: ffffff
|
Post by RyanAB on Mar 22, 2016 19:28:01 GMT -5
I guess these are good ideas, but we really need heavier moderation of the lounge (like I said, make people who are responsible that are common to find in the lounge lounge mods, that can lock ****post threads ;3;) nah, we should be deleting them instead. locking them brings a bad example |
|
4,693 posts
Discord: lumpfriend
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"000000"}
Mini-Profile Name Color: ffffff
Mini-Profile Text Color: ffffff
|
Post by Lumpy on Mar 22, 2016 20:00:03 GMT -5
No, you're right. But I think there might be a slight difference between the guy who made Nine Circles XIII and someone like Mazl when it comes to reviewing levels. There's a reason we appreciate certain critics, even if they don't make movies, and that's because they make well thought-out reviews, and point out how you can make something better. Most top 100 know what a feature worthy level is, and they know how to make good design and gameplay. I never liked the idea of level judges from the start anyways. And even if the staff agree to demote all current level judges, that doesn't mean you can't still write reviews for levels on the thread. It only means you wouldn't be able to move them into a board until a level judge sees. I suggest you make a series of tests to see if we are worthy of being a level judge. That's a lot more fair than mass demoting everyone. Im not against the idea of tests but how can someone be tested in the first place? |
|
2,322 posts
Hardest Demon: Blue
Mini-Profile Name Color: {"image":"http://freedesignfile.com/upload/2014/07/Shiny-eco-style-green-background-vector-01.jpg","color":""}
|
Post by ~Pear~ on Mar 22, 2016 20:03:47 GMT -5
I suggest you make a series of tests to see if we are worthy of being a level judge. That's a lot more fair than mass demoting everyone. Im not against the idea of tests but how can someone be tested in the first place? look through their reviews and see of they have quality reviews, or quick, 4 sentence reviews |
|
2,471 posts
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"00197c"}
Mini-Profile Name Color: ffffff
Mini-Profile Text Color: ffffff
|
Post by horizon on Mar 22, 2016 20:57:19 GMT -5
I could not disagree more with 1. Just like megaman2 said, after they have been warned they should know to not do it again. Necroposting and spamming hurt the pleasantness of the forum so of course mod has every right to suspend the account if the user keeps hurting the forum even after they have been personally informed that what they are doing is not okay. What I have seen the mods here are actually very forgiving so if anything they should get stricter. Everything else is common sense. I'm on computer all the time and I'm bored so I would gladly try to moderate this forum for the lols. Okay not really tbh. not for everyone, i was never notified of being warned so i could have kept on doing it without a care i didn't, but still |
|
3,110 posts
Favorite Level: Toxic sewers
Hardest Demon: ultra drivers
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"ac1aab"}
Mini-Profile Name Color: fa55f3
Mini-Profile Text Color: f842f0
|
Post by Retired moderator. on Mar 22, 2016 21:38:10 GMT -5
I suggest you make a series of tests to see if we are worthy of being a level judge. That's a lot more fair than mass demoting everyone. Im not against the idea of tests but how can someone be tested in the first place? give a variety of levels for us to review. We all have the same one. They should be able to test for bias, detail, etc |
|
