|
Post by Deleted on Apr 23, 2016 15:37:20 GMT -5
Geometrical dominator remake i made \(c:)/ Gameplay gets fun once you practice it ;3; The memorization neon part looks cancerous but its actually pretty fun :b Id is 19181269
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 26, 2016 15:56:32 GMT -5
rip thread
|
|
|
Post by kiriE on Apr 26, 2016 15:59:04 GMT -5
Be patient, most judges start reviewing from the bottom of the list ;p
|
|
27 posts
Creator Points: 0
Favorite Level: The Magma Caverns
Hardest Demon: pink
Mini-Profile Background: black
Mini-Profile Name Color: purple
|
Post by Arkadium on Apr 26, 2016 17:07:02 GMT -5
Gameplay: 2.5/4 Lots of memorization and I personally do not like the gameplay Decor/Design: 4/4 Very nice design, I love the lasers in the background! Music Sync 2/2 Perfect music sync throughout the whole level! Excellent Job! Originality: 1.1x I like how you remixed Geometrical Dominator into a harder and better level! Total: 9.35 FEATURE-WORTHY: Personally I really like this level, but to improve I suggest making more fun gameplay and less memorization. Diffuculty: ![](http://i.imgur.com/R7FdYyJ.png) 9 RainbowGPF kiriE megaman9 skylighter @thedevon
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 26, 2016 21:24:04 GMT -5
Gameplay: 2.5/4 Lots of memorization and I personally do not like the gameplay Decor/Design: 4/4 Very nice design, I love the lasers in the background! Music Sync 2/2 Perfect music sync throughout the whole level! Excellent Job! Originality: 1.1x I like how you remixed Geometrical Dominator into a harder and better level! Total: 9.35 FEATURE-WORTHY: Personally I really like this level, but to improve I suggest making more fun gameplay and less memorization. Diffuculty: 9 RainbowGPF kiriE megaman9 skylighter @thedevon Thanks but, Theres absolutely no way this is insane 9 star. ;3;
|
|
|
Post by DaxD0w on Apr 26, 2016 21:32:58 GMT -5
Gameplay: 2.5/4 Lots of memorization and I personally do not like the gameplay Decor/Design: 4/4 Very nice design, I love the lasers in the background! Music Sync 2/2 Perfect music sync throughout the whole level! Excellent Job! Originality: 1.1x I like how you remixed Geometrical Dominator into a harder and better level! Total: 9.35 FEATURE-WORTHY: Personally I really like this level, but to improve I suggest making more fun gameplay and less memorization. Diffuculty: ![](http://i.imgur.com/R7FdYyJ.png) 9 RainbowGPF kiriE megaman9 skylighter @thedevon Don't tag megaman in this board ![:P](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/tongue.png) He has other stuff to work on. Thats why we have level judges to do the job ![:P](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/tongue.png) And just saying, when you review, you need to be more strict about it. Not just like 1 sentence per section and adding like a bunch or spaces to make it look long. Add one or 2 paragraphs describing and being specific about stuff. not just like "There is lots of memorization" you need to be more specific about it. Such as "There is much memorization in this UFO part. I think you can reduce the memorizing parts here to make the gameplay much easier unless if you are targeting a hard demon level." such stuff like that. But don't worry, i started off like this too. If you go to my recent posts and look through, i had like "Detail is good, music sync is good, gameplay is good" stuff but then Mr. Ian steps in and gives me tips. One BIG tip is NEVER USE THE WORD ANNOYING when reviewing. So yea ![:P](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/tongue.png) Unless if youre just to have fun reviewing but if if youre targeting to become a level judge, you need to write more specification. ^^ This is a great example for each part in describing such as detail, music sync, gameplay etc.
|
|
|
Post by Viceroy on Apr 26, 2016 21:35:49 GMT -5
First off, there's NO WAY this is insane 9 star. Obviously demon! In my opinion, best remake of Geometrical Dominator so far. Decoration: 8/10Very good overall, just a few complaints. In some parts (like the first robot) you put lots of decoration and made it unique. In the robot/cube after the first wave, however, you reverted back to Robtop style, and the level was pretty empty. Try to keep it consistent! The black things at 0:58 are a bit out of place in my opinion. If you absolutely MUST keep them, then I would at the very least add the glow objects to both sides; in black color. This would make it look a bit better I think. Neon memorization cube/robot is great, no complaints. I liked the following wave and dual. Everything else from here on out was pretty great. Maybe just a BIT more decoration in the last few sections though. Gameplay: 8.5/10Fast-paced and fun for the most part, good balance of memorization and skill. Everything is good i think, except for the first robot part. For some reason, the gameplay there really bothered me. I cant quite place it XD There were also a lot of bugs in the rainbow part and the first robot. Music sync: 10/10
Just as good as the original Geometrical Dominator, probably better. 8.83/10 Feature-worthyAn excellent remake of Geometrical Dominator with a unique take on decoration; but minor gameplay faults and decoration mishaps can take away from the niceties. Demon 10 ![](http://i.imgur.com/zKz1sSy.png)
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 28, 2016 21:09:31 GMT -5
Diffuculty: ![](http://i.imgur.com/R7FdYyJ.png) 9 Get out.
|
|
534 posts
Creator Points: 4
Favorite Level: GrindZone
|
Post by TheEpicLucas on Apr 29, 2016 10:23:04 GMT -5
Also I've seen level judges using the word "cancerous". Please make that stop.
|
|
|
Post by kiriE on Apr 29, 2016 10:32:37 GMT -5
Also I've seen level judges using the word "cancerous". Please make that stop. Why? It's just an adjective describing how bad something is. Ik it can be a bit offending 'cause of the real cancer disease, but in this case it's only describing if something doesn't really work, don't take it personal. That goes the same for you Dax, why is 'annoying' a bad word? I use it ALL the time and it perfectly describes certain unnecessary buggy timings or buggy points without being too rude. Annoying is afterall a much nicer word than "awful" and "horrendous"... Just my opinion though.
|
|
|
Post by DaxD0w on Apr 29, 2016 19:11:51 GMT -5
Also I've seen level judges using the word "cancerous". Please make that stop. Why? It's just an adjective describing how bad something is. Ik it can be a bit offending 'cause of the real cancer disease, but in this case it's only describing if something doesn't really work, don't take it personal. That goes the same for you Dax, why is 'annoying' a bad word? I use it ALL the time and it perfectly describes certain unnecessary buggy timings or buggy points without being too rude. Annoying is afterall a much nicer word than "awful" and "horrendous"... Just my opinion though. Dude the hell? I didn't use the word "cancerous" in here. He probably is messing with me ![:P](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/tongue.png)
|
|
|
Post by kiriE on Apr 30, 2016 3:28:34 GMT -5
Why? It's just an adjective describing how bad something is. Ik it can be a bit offending 'cause of the real cancer disease, but in this case it's only describing if something doesn't really work, don't take it personal. That goes the same for you Dax, why is 'annoying' a bad word? I use it ALL the time and it perfectly describes certain unnecessary buggy timings or buggy points without being too rude. Annoying is afterall a much nicer word than "awful" and "horrendous"... Just my opinion though. Dude the hell? I didn't use the word "cancerous" in here. He probably is messing with me ![:P](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/tongue.png) No, I meant why you didn't like annoying, not cancerous ![:P](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/tongue.png)
|
|
3,110 posts
Favorite Level: Toxic sewers
Hardest Demon: ultra drivers
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"ac1aab"}
Mini-Profile Name Color: fa55f3
Mini-Profile Text Color: f842f0
|
Post by Retired moderator. on Apr 30, 2016 3:36:28 GMT -5
Dude the hell? I didn't use the word "cancerous" in here. He probably is messing with me ![:P](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/tongue.png) No, I meant why you didn't like annoying, not cancerous ![:P](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/tongue.png) The word annoying is extremely vague. Saying that the ship or cube part is annoying tells the creator absolutely nothing. Annoying is just too vague of an adjective to properly describe a part without using other words to describe it. I guess you could use it if you back it up as to reasons why, but annoying just sounds extremely subjective in the first place. Example: (I'm reviewing ultra drivers in this example.) "The gameplay was good for the most part but the dual wave at 40 was very annoying. " Now, that doesn't tell us much. Even if we added to that sentence by saying "Because it is extremely hard to see what you are doing" you could just use a better, more clear adjective to describe it or just say that you disliked it because you couldn't see. Annoying is a word i advise new judges to stay away from because, as they are building their judging skill, they may not put enough detail and annoying would make the review look bad.
|
|
|
Post by kiriE on Apr 30, 2016 3:44:07 GMT -5
No, I meant why you didn't like annoying, not cancerous ![:P](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/tongue.png) The word annoying is extremely vague. Saying that the ship or cube part is annoying tells the creator absolutely nothing. Annoying is just too vague of an adjective to properly describe a part without using other words to describe it. Annoying is just a word new judges should refrain from using. That's why I give reasons for it. You do have to give reasons of why you're saying a part is "bad" or why it "didn't work" too. Besides, do you guys really have a problem with me saying: "The cube part was annoying because of all the unnecessary invisible portals" ? It's practically the same thing with using a different word: "The cube part was awful because of the unnecessary invisible portals".
|
|
3,110 posts
Favorite Level: Toxic sewers
Hardest Demon: ultra drivers
Mini-Profile Background: {"image":"","color":"ac1aab"}
Mini-Profile Name Color: fa55f3
Mini-Profile Text Color: f842f0
|
Post by Retired moderator. on Apr 30, 2016 3:46:01 GMT -5
The word annoying is extremely vague. Saying that the ship or cube part is annoying tells the creator absolutely nothing. Annoying is just too vague of an adjective to properly describe a part without using other words to describe it. Annoying is just a word new judges should refrain from using. That's why I give reasons for it. You do have to give reasons of why you're saying a part is "bad" or why it "didn't work" too. Besides, do you guys really have a problem with me saying: "The cube part was annoying because of all the unnecessary invisible portals" ? It's practically the same thing with using a different word: "The cube part didn't work because of the unnecessary invisible portals". Annoying is fine if you back it up, like you said. It's just that new judges always use it in the way that I gave in the first example, so I tell them to use a less vague adjective so that they can actually give detail. I actually edited my other post. Reread it pls
|
|